Due Diligence
Adverse Media Screening
Identification of publicly reported information suggesting an individual or entity may present integrity or reputational risk.
Purpose
Adverse media screening surfaces publicly reported information — news reporting, regulatory notices, litigation reporting — relevant to an assessment of integrity or reputational risk.
Scope
Screening covers major news media, regulatory and enforcement notices, and litigation reporting in publicly accessible sources, within the jurisdictions and languages agreed for the engagement.
Typical commissioning circumstances
- As a component of a wider due diligence or enhanced due diligence engagement.
- Periodic monitoring of an existing relationship.
- Following an internal concern raised about a counterparty.
Sources and methods
Screening uses licensed media monitoring tools and manual review, applying search terms designed to capture relevant reporting while limiting false positives from common names.
Deliverables
A report listing relevant items found, each cited to its source and dated, with an explicit distinction between corroborated findings and single-source allegations, as described in the due diligence methodology overview.
Limitations
Adverse media reflects what has been publicly reported, not an independent investigation of the underlying facts. A reported allegation is not treated as a proven finding unless independently corroborated.
Confidentiality
Screening outcomes are provided to the commissioning party only and are not published in the registry.
Review process
Where a subject disputes an item included in a report, they may request review through the review and correction process.
Commission an assessment
Engagements are scoped to the assessed risk of the relationship in question. Submit an enquiry to discuss scope before an engagement is commissioned.
Commission an assessment